Dynamic Type: From 16 to 81!
•Full Process order of 76 of the 81 types
•81 types mapped to APS and Enneagram
"Dynamic Type"
On the first page, I mentioned a bit of information we have not seen much; that Galen actually had NINE temperaments! His original version of the matrix used the "hot/cold" and "wet/dry" scale used in mapping the corresponding elements; However, he also had MODERATE points on the scale, between how and cold, and warm and dry:
wet | ? | dry | |
hot | air/blood | ? | fire/yellow bile |
? | ? | ? | ? | cold | water/phlegm | ? | earth/black bile |
(See:
http://www.greekmedicine.net/b_p/Inherent_Temperament.html
http://www.unani.com/heating.htm
http://sun2.science.wayne.edu/~tpartrid/Manuscripts/HEETemperament1.25.02.doc)
One of the things I liked so much about the FIRO-APS matrix, is the graded scales, and the "moderate" Phlegmatic blends. People scoring in these ranges can be said to express and/or respond as an ambivert. Therefore, if you're not completely introverted or extroverted, it will be covered in your temperament designation. With the MBTI dichotomies, it is "either/or". Scores are usually in perceptages, so it is possible to come close on E/I, for instance, or any of the other three scales. However, this will not be reflected in the type code; which will be the same, regardless of how close the scores are. People often complain of not fitting well either as an introvert or extrovert, and thus some claim "ambiversion". I and a few others out there have thought of ways to try to allow this in the type code.
This is done by adding a third
point to each dichotomy, reperesenting a "moderate" range, which is what yields the nine basic types in each area in the table further down where it is attempted to be mapped to both APs and Enneagram. In the EISenFelt
system, "X" is used as the ambiguous code. In most systems, is refers to an "undecided preference" (with the goal being to eventually find which one it is), and in Socionics, it appears to be accepted as an "ambidextrous" function; at least the way I saw it used in their Enneagram correlation. However, when dealing with
incomplete codes (skipping some of the letter slots), if we use all X's, we won’t know which slot is which, since two and three letter codes skip a slot. If we say "XJ", is that between TJ and FJ, or between NJ and SJ? Then, there are the cases where you have more than one X in the code. So later on, I will use other letters, for three of the slots. X remains for the third (T/F) slot; A, for
"ambiversion"
is the first slot, and "Y" is the fourth (J/P) slot. For familiarity
sake, when using all four letters, I will use the X's, but when abbreviating
with two or three letters, I will use the other letters. The table will use both
designations, but with the new letters more prominent.
In a type discussion, where people were complaining of being "ambiverted", and I mentioned this idea, another person came up with what neutral facets would do to the functions
Instead of W, X and Y, he came up with actual names for the new facets:
I/A/E (Introverted, Ambiverted, Extraverted)
N/R/S (iNtuitive, Realist, Sensor)
F/B/T (Feeling, Balanced, Thinking)
J/M/P (Judging, Malleable, Perceiving)
(Thus, R=W; B=X; M=Y)
The key then, is:
Axxx dominant function is ambiverted (used both internally and externally in equal weight).
xRxx prefer both Sensing and iNtuition
xxBx prefer both Thinking and Feeling
xxxM both preferred (judging and perceiving) functions are extraverted
We can see right away, that there will be a clash when the dominant is ambiverted (A), yet both functions are llcoded as extraverted (M).
As examples using I-N-F-J as the potential statics in each position, and assuming Dominant, Auxiliary, Tertiary, Inferior ordering:
ARBM -- Xx, Xx, Xx, Xx (Everything is subject to change completely, although the functions are in an unknowable specific pattern at any given moment. Worst case scenario.)
IRBM -- Xi, Xe, Xi, Xe (Well, the I/E is static... everything else is dynamic.)
INBM -- Xi, Xe [N], Xi, Xe [s] (We know one in the first block is N, and one in the second block is S, but we don't know what kind or where... and it can change.)
INFM -- Xi, Xe [NF], Xi Xe [ST] (We now know this is an INF with an EST shadow. However, the functions are subject to change, except that the first block contains some form of Feeling and Intuition, and the second block contains some form of Thinking and Sensing.)
ARBJ -- Xx, Xx [Je Pi], Xx, Xx [Ji Pe] (We only know that this type has Extraverted Judgment and Introverted perception in the first block, and Introverted Judgment and Extroverted perception in the second block.)
IRBJ -- Pi, Je, Ji, Pe (This is an IJ type. They use some form of Introverted perception as a dominant function, and some form of Extroverted Judgment as an Auxiliary. The specifics are subject to change.)
INBJ -- Ni, Je, Ji, Se (This is an INJ type. They use Ni and have inferior Se, and use some kind of Aux. Extroverted judgement and Tertiary Introverted Judgment that is subject to change.
ARFJ -- Xx, Xx [Fe] Xx, Xx [Ti]. (This type uses Fe in the first block and has a Ti shadow somewhere in the second block, however the specific location and accompanying functions are subject to change.)
IRFJ -- Pi Fe Ti Pe (This is an IFJ type. They have some Introverted perception as dominant, Fe auxiliary and Ti tertiary, and then Extraverted perception as a shadow.)
ANFJ -- Xx, Xx [Ni Fe] Xx, Xx [Ti Se] (This is an NFJ type. They have either Ni or Fe as dominant, and the other as auxiliary, but which is subject to change. The same applies to their shadow.)
ANBM -- Xx, Xx [N] Xx, Xx [s] (I/E not static, otherwise same as INBM.)
ARFM -- Xx, Xx [F] Xx, Xx [T] (J/P not static, otherwise same as ARFJ. Somewhere in first block is Fe or Fi, somewhere in second is Ti or Te. Exact position subject to change.)
Here are the rest, but most without the functions:
13 ERBM
14 ENBM
15 ENFM
16 ERBJ [S&N]e/[T&F]e-
17 ENBJ
18 ERFJ
19 ERBP
20 ENBP
21 ERFP
22 IRBP
23 INBP
24 IRFP
25 ARBP
26 ANBP
27 ARFP
28 INTM
29 ARTJ [S&N]e/i(Sa/Na)-Te
30 IRTJ
31 ANTJ
32 ARTM
33 ENTM
34 ERTJ
35 ERTP
36 IRTP
37 ARTP
38 ISBM
39 ISBJ
40 ASBM
41 ESBM [S/T/F]e
42 ESFM
43 ESBJ
44 ESBP
45 ISBP
46 ASBP
47 ISTM
48 ASTJ
49 ISTJ
50 ASTM -[S/T]e-
51 ESTM
52 ASTP
53 ASFJ
54 ASFM
55 ASFP
56 IRFM
57 ANFM
58 ANBJ
59 ERFM
60 ASBJ [T&F]e/i(Ta/Fa)-Si
61 ANTM
62 ANTP
63 ERTM [T/S/N]e-
64 IRTM
65 ANFP
(plus the original 16, of course)
Full Process order of 76 of the types
In another type forum discussion, one person, Angelica Graue (following tables courtesy of), started a thread called "76 Types", and actually went and did all the cognitive processes for all but five of the 81 above. XXXX (ARBM), XSXX (ASBM), XNXX (ANBM), XXTX (ARTM) and XXFX (ARFM) were deemed too uneven to place the order (the method discussed below. As you'll see, two of those: XSXX and XNXX were the last and hardest for me to place in the E/R version). The first three of these omitted ones were among the few earlier done, above.
ESTJ
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ESTP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ESTx
1 2 7 8 ESFJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ESFP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ESFx
1 2 7 8 ESxJ
1 2 4 6 8 8 ESxP
1 2 4.5 7 8 ESxx
1 2 7.666 8 ENTJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ENTP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ENTx
1 2 7 8 ENFJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ENFP
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 ENFx
1 2 7 8 ENxJ
1 2 4 6 8 8 ENxP
1 2 4.5 7 8 ENxx
1 2 7.666 8 ExTJ
1 2 4.5 7 8 ExTP
1 2 4 6 8 8 ExTx
1 2 7.666 8 ExFJ
1 2 4.5 7 8 ExFP
1 2 4 6 8 8 ExFx
1 2 7.666 8 ExxJ
1 2 7 8 ExxP
1 2 7 8 Exxx
|
ISTJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ISTP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ISTx
1 2 7 8 ISFJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ISFP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ISFx
1 2 7 8 ISxJ
1 2 4.5 7 8 ISxP
1 2 4 6 8 8 ISxx
1 2 7.666 8 INTJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 INTP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 INTx
1 2 7 8 INFJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 INFP
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 INFx
1 2 7 8 INxJ
1 2 4.5 7 8 INxP
1 2 4 6 8 8 INxx
1 2 7.666 8 IxTJ
1 2 4 6 8 8 IxTP
1 2 4.5 7 8 IxTx
1 2 7.666 8 IxFJ
1 2 4 6 8 8 IxFP
1 2 4.5 7 8 IxFx
1 2 7.666 8 IxxJ
1 2 7 8 IxxP
1 2 7 8 Ixxx
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xSTJ
1 2 7 8 xSTP
1 2 7 8 xSTx
xSxJ
1 2 7.666 8 xNTJ
1 2 7 8 xNTP
1 2 7 8 xNTx
xNxJ
1 2 7.666 8 xxTJ
1 2 7.666 8 xxFJ
1 2 7.666 8 xxxJ
|
xSFJ
1 2 7 8 xSFP
1 2 7 8 xSFx
xSxP
1 2 7.666 8 xNFJ
1 2 7 8 xNFP
1 2 7 8 xNFx
1 8
xNxP
1 2 7.666 8 xxTP
1 2 7.666 8 xxFP
1 2 7.666 8 xxxP
|
Gray: YYYYs
Blue: YYYxs, YxxYs, xYYYs
Greens and Purples: YYxYs, YxYYs
(specifically),
Greens : EYxJs, IxYPs
Purples: EYxPs, IxYJs
Orange: YYxxs, YxYxs, xYxYs, xxYYs
Red: Yxxxs, xYYxs, xxxYs
All patterns add up to 36
Here, she explains her methodology:
It's the same as the 1-8 for the basic 16 patterns. only the thing is, since you have more first functions, (and 2nd or third, whatever) as you're combining patterns, you have to have other functions in lower places to compensate. So you're not going to get functions in eight different places, although generally there are still four functions on each side. With the rationale that the natural capacities of the patterns (if not individuals) are equivalent, I took the number 36, which was the total if you add up 1-8 for the main functions, and applied it as the total for the other 60 types. I was also working with the idea of balance between the functions themselves (for example, if there are 2 ones and 2 twos, there also have to be 2 sevens and 2 eights). I was able to apply this later by making sure that working outside-in, there were either 4 sets of functions that added up to nine, or two that added up to nine and one that added up to eighteen in the middle, so it's all balanced out in that way as well as by the general number. Again, how I figured out the patterns was by combining existing patterns. I put the patterns of the types I was combining into rows, using what seems to be the standard E before I, S before N, T before F, and J before P, and then crossing out repetitions of each function. Initially I had it wrong- I used the functions in the order that they first appeared, but at some point I realized that Te and Se seemed more likely to come before Si and Ti in my pattern, and I looked at a few other peoples' patterns as well which made more sense the second way. Oh yeah, the second way was to either take the first four functions and then the last four and cross out the ones in the middle (or the first five with the last two between primary and shadow). That's the way I currently have the patterns, and i'm convinced of it because it also has a similar structure to the basic 16. It keeps the E I reversal from primary to shadow which the other method doesn't, and it keeps the order of functions' opposites (by this I mean, if you have Ni first, you're going to have Se before Si).
81 Types and the APS (And Enneagram)
THIS PART TO BE RETHOUGHT This idea was borne from the notion of "ambiversion", which is a moderate point between E and I, and extend it to S/N, T/F and J/P. However, S/N and T/F are the functions themselves, and can only be "either/or" as the Myers-Briggs test was originally designed. Even if you are almost in the middle of one of those dichotomies; on the borderline; you still are going to be on one side or the other, and this is how the dichotomies are structured. One clue to this, is that it was very difficult to determine what would be S/N neutral, in particular, since the tie together opposite temperaments. So therefore, you would expect the Phlegmatic Blends in Control to be S/N neutral. But just as one of the proofs of the Conation/Control correlation was that Arno described the Choleric in Control as "intuitive"; he also describes the Choleric Phlegmatic as such. This would lie between Choleric and the "Sensing" Sanguine. So, it is futile to try to make that S/N neutral. Another issue is that this system will end up with the Supine/Choleric as the "true" INTP, and the Phlegmatic/Choleric as ANTY. Yet, in looking at my own type in both systems as discussed above, where I just barely made it into that type; it has become clear that the P/C is the more "pure" INTP, while the Supine apparently gives the type I/E and T/F ambiguities. So that part of the idea is to be dropped as well. It seems that since Supine expresses as an introvert and responds as an extrovert, its behavior comes off more as the true "ambivert" in the MBTI system (as its close counterpart the 6 does in Enneagram). So perhaps this will have to be factored into the idea. At the bottom, however, are a few more ideas that others came up with. |
The following is just a fanciful extension of the 16types system, where the four temperament/four interaction styles model is converted to a five temperament + Phlegmatic blends system in both the conative and interaction scales, yielding basically nine temperaments and nine Interaction Styles, also corresponding to Enneagram "Social" and "Self-Survival" types blended together for 81 types! Supine and Phlegmatic are now split into separate temperaments in both scales. Supine becomes the NF temperament, and INP/ISF Interaction Style exclusively, and Phlegmatic is now placed into the new "neutral" category.
Like the Keirseyan system, the letters will no longer carry the Myersian functional meaning, which will become undiscernable as more X's are added.
Starting with the Conation Temperaments (Control), it is basically easy. The original temperaments retain the same two letter codes throughout both the original four Interaction Styles, and the five additional Phlegmatic types. The original four Interaction Styles retain their letter codes as much as possible, but since they need three letters, there are not enough for all nine conation temperaments they are blended with. So some of the Phlegmatic blends will have one or more of the letters "X-ed" out. The four new "Phlegmatic blend" interaction styles, when blended with the original four conation temperaments are fairly easy. They are just "A" versions of the original types. The Phlegmatic interaction style is similar, but will have two X's, because it is more "neutral" than the blends.
It is when we move into the blends of Phlegmatic and the Phlegmatic blends together with each other, that the logic begins to break down. It's easy to take an interaction style by itself, like Chart the Course, which is IST or INJ, and then compare it with fellow directive style In Charge, which is EST or ENJ, and figure that what lies between them would be AST or ANJ. Comparing the In Charge with Get Things Going, it is EST/ENJ versus ESF/ENP. So what lies between them would be ESX- or EN-X (ESX or ENY). This is when combined with the original four conation temperaments, which are set at NF, NT, SP and SJ. So since in those blends, three letters are always accounted for, all you have to do is "X" out the remaining letter. However, in determining what lies between the four conation temperaments, it is not that easy. Recall, that the S/N scale connects diametric opposite temperaments (when converted to the E/R matrix). So, adjacent temperaments will always have the opposite perception code. How do we figure what lies between an SJ and an NT? (i.e. Structure-oriented, but "ambidextrous" C/U). Or SJ and NF? (Cooperative, ambidextrous Str/M) Or SP and NF (Motive oriented; ambidextrous C/U) or SP and NT (Utilitarian; ambidextrous Str/M)? They would all result in WY or WX types. But there aren't enough of those to fill all four "inbetween" (moderate blend) conation temperaments. And since Phlegmatic in Control would lie between SJ and SP, then should it be "SY" (S-X)? It also lies between NT and NF, so should it instead be NX-? Basically, we will see more and more such ambiguities, so we basically have to choose the "rules" as we go along.
So to start, the Phlegmatic Control I deemed to be mostly a Sensor, because of the congruent eC and wC, like the Sanguine and Melancholy. To keep with that rule, it would figure the Phlegmatic blends in Control, like the Supine and Choleric, would be iNtuitors. But of course, there were not enough N's left to fill them, so the rest of them would be W's (ambiguous S/N or -X--). One problem is that XXXX (Or "AWXY") would end up being something other than the pure Phlegmatic in Inclusion and Control, and there was no logical reason to assign this purely "neutral" code to a blend that was not purely neutral in all scales like P-P was. This meant that some of the Phlegmatics in Control had to be W's rather than S types, because then by extension, the other two WXY's would be the same Control, but with E or I expressed Inclusion. So since all of the D or Inf. interaction styles were fixed as ST's or SF's, this would leave the D/Inf-neutral CP/GP and MP/SP Inclusion blended with Phlegmatic in Control as EWXY and IWXY, respectively. This would create a problem, as now three S types would have to be placed in the "Phlegmatic blend in Control" area, with absolutely no logical reason to choose which ones, except by elimination. This will be seen below.
Some principles I was able to use were that a TJ is always purely directive (low wI and low wC), and an FP is always purely informative (high wI and high wC). So all crosses of the directive (structure-oriented), but ambiverted Phlegmatic Melancholy/Phlegmatic Choleric in Control with its own Inclusion type, (i.e the "pure" PM/PC), or with Melancholy, or Choleric in Inclusion will be a TJ type. Since I and E (and now A) represent eI, then the blends will be AXTJ, IXTJ, and EXTJ, respectively. The Phlegmatic Sanguine/Phlegmatic Supine blends with other informative types will work the same way, but as AXFP, IXFP and EXFP.
For the "Wanted"-neutral pure types (MP/SP or CP/GP in both scales), I looked at different principles, but the ones that seem to work best is that these are the -XFJ and -XTP (or WFJ/WTP) types. It becomes very difficult now, because remember, while F and P indicate high w in one or both scales, and T and J indicate low w in one or both scales, it is S and N that determine which scale each letter determines. F, when paired with N is a high wI temperament or interaction style. P is the reverse of that. And the same dynamic with the T and J for low wI and low wC. But now, in "S/N Neutral" territory, we lose that way of determining which scale the Judging type and "extroverted judging" codes refer to. With the pure MP/SP and CP/GP, it is a little bit easier, and can be determined in two ways: being D/Inf. and Str/M neutral (moderate "wanted" in both scales"), you would expect them to be a mixture of F/P with T/J, just like the I/C blends of Low and high "w" types. (e.g, the "San-Mel" ESFJ, or "Mel-San" ISTP). Plus, if you take ISFJ Sup-Mel, and the INFJ, Mel-Sup, you would expect IXFJ to be in between them. And between Sup. and Mel. is MP/SP. Since it is in both scales, then you would expect the pure "MP/SP-MP/SP" in both Inclusion and Control to be the IXFJ. Since FJ also indicates the most "cooperative", that shows that the type has a very low eC, which is the case with the pure MP/SP. Likewise, EXTP turns out to be the very pragmatic (high eC) CP/GP pure blend, which lies between ESTP (Chlor-San) and ENTP (San-Chlor). This does not work with other types. Like the cross between the ESFJ (San-Mel) and the ENFJ (Chlor-Sup). You have two pairs of diametrically opposite temperaments, and what lies directly between them would be a pure Phlegmatic. And there are redundancies, as pure Phlegmatic would lie directly between the ISTP (Mel-San) and INTP (Sup-Chlor) as well. EXFJ and IXTP were among those that were very hard to place. They end up, respectively, as GP/CP in Inclusion-MP/SP in Control, and MP/SP in Inclusion-GP/CP in Control. The C/U scale was the determining factor. FJ must have a low eC, and TP a high eC.
So basically the rest of the table had to be done in such a "process of elimination" fashion. As placement went on, the increasing number of X's made things become more ambiguous, and there was less and less logical reason to choose one type over another for a letter code. Like does XXXJ indicate directive, structure oriented, or cooperative? A "J" can mean any of those three things, and without the S/N or even the T/F to indicate which, it is hard to tell what it would mean. I placed XXXJ as P-PM/PC (Phlegmatic in Inclusion; Phlegmatic Melancholy or Phlegmatic Choleric in Control). J in that case represents the Structure-oriented (low w) Control, and every other scale (eI, eC, wI) is moderate. But XXTX seemed to be able to have been used for that as well. Or XXXJ represent the cooperative and otherwise neutral P-MP/SP. That ends up AXFJ. Here, I did it by extension of the pure types. The pure MP/SP is IWFJ, because MP/SP in Inclusion is introverted. So the "ambiverted" (moderate eI) version of this would have the Inclusion type move over into the pure Phlegmatic range. XXTX ends up as PM/PC-GP/CP. Here, T indicates both the directive Inclusion, and the pragmatic Control.
To decide which blends would receive the NXJ and NXP codes, I paired directive Interaction Styles with Cooperative but Str/M-neutral MP/SP in Control for the J types. The blends with Informative types became XFX's. Informative Interaction Styles were paired with the Pragmatic CP/GP in Control for the P types. The blends of that Control with Directives end up as XTX's.
Then, there was finally the placement of the three remaining "S" types: ESXX, ISXX, and XSXX. There were also the three NXX types as well. You would also expect these XY types to be C/U neutral as well as D/Inf. and Str/M neutral, which would be all moderate "wanted" scores, and moderate expressed Control. But the way I had done it so far, all that were left were the C/U neutral, but Structure or Motive oriented Phlegmatic-expressives in Control. Also, there was no logical reason to designate one particular type a Sensor when the rest aren't, so the only thing I could do is use the Interaction Style as the determining factor. Interaction Styles are normally S/N blind, you may recall. But it was the only way I could make some reason for designating S and N types in this area. So Sanguine and Melancholy in Inclusion become "sensing" when paired with the opposite "w" in Control. (Sanguines in Inclusion, are very much into senses). Supine and Choleric in Inclusion then determine the "intuitive" type. Paired with the same w in Control (M-PM/PC, for instance) would result in a TJ or FP, remember. So M-PS/PG becomes ISXX, G-PM/PC becomes ESXX, S-PM/PC becomes INXX and C-PG/Ps becomes ENXX. As far as the lack of Str/M neutrality of these Control types in light of XY being Str/M neutral by virtue of there being no way to deciper that scale from it, the only way this can be rationalized is that the opposite D/Inf. of the Interaction styles cancel out Str./M. Low wI cancels out high wC, and high wI cancels out low wC. T, F, J or P can indicate either wI or wC, so opposite wI and wC can cancel out those letters leaving the X's in their place. It may not really be the most consistent method, but that seems to be the only way to fit them all. The only temperament that is both C/U and Str.M neutral is the Phlegmatic in Control, and there were only nine slots open for that, and they are all taken. The rest of these XY's had to go somewhere.
So these more ambiguous type
codes have been left in gray. I finally got it down to two remaining codes;
ASXX and ANXX, and the two remaining types were the PG/PS
and PM/PC blends with each other. There was absolutely no way to determine
which would be the Sensor, and which would be the iNtuitor.
They both lie between S and N types. And I could no longer use the Interaction
Style either. So these I had to leave ambiguous, for now. Perhaps, the
statistical correlations of S and N could come into play, but who knows.
One slight evidence for PG/PS-PM/PC as XNXX is that my KTSII score, while determined as ENFJ (again, way off for me), did still have scores ratios for each of the four dicholtomies. N was the most pronounced, at 7, vs. 3 for "S". But J and P were equal at 5! (I still do not know what was used to determine the favor being given to J). But E/I and FT were both close, at 6/4. So the last letter technically shoudl be an "X", and the first and third are close to ambiguous as well: XNXX. The PG/PS-PM/PC blend is not really all that far from my APS score! In both I and C, it is moved towards moderate "e" from where my scores are!
Table of 81 Interaction/Conation (Inclusion/Control) types
A: Ambiversion (ambiguous E/I)
W: ambiguous S/N
X: ambiguous T/F
Y: ambiguous J/P
Control → Inclusion↓ |
SJ Melancholy |
NT Choleric |
SP Sanguine |
NF Supine |
Phleg. |
MP/SP |
GP/CP |
PM/PC |
PG/PS |
IST/INJ
|
ISTJ
|
INTJ M-C |
ISTP
|
INFJ
|
ISTY
|
INXJ
|
IWTY
|
IWTJ
|
ISXY
|
EST/ENJ
|
ESTJ
|
ENTJ
|
ESTP
|
ENFJ
|
ESTY
|
ENXJ
|
EWTY
|
EWTJ
|
ENXY
|
ESF/ENP
|
ESFJ
|
ENTP
|
ESFP
|
ENFP
|
ESFY
|
EWFY
|
ENXP
|
ESXY
|
EWFP
|
ISF/INP
|
ISFJ
|
INTP
|
ISFP
|
INFP
|
ISFY
|
IWFY
|
INXP
|
INXY
|
IWFP
|
Phlegmatic
|
ASXJ
|
ANTY
|
ASXP
|
ANFY
|
AWXY
|
AWFJ
|
AWTP
|
AWXJ
|
AWXP
|
MP/SP
|
ISXJ
|
INTY
|
ISXP
|
INFY
|
IWXY
|
IWFJ
|
IWTP
|
IWXJ
|
IWXP
|
GP/CP
|
ESXJ
|
ENTY
|
ESXP
|
ENFY
|
EWXY
|
EWFJ
|
EWTP
|
EWXJ
|
EWXP
|
AST/ANJ
|
ASTJ
|
ANTJ
|
ASTP
|
ANFJ
|
ASTY
|
ANXJ
|
AWTY
|
AWTJ
|
A?XY
|
ASF/ANP
|
ASFJ
|
ANTP
|
ASFP
|
ANFP
|
ASFY
|
AWFY
|
ANXP
|
A?XY
|
AWFP
|
So as we have seen, the 16 types appear to cover the areas of Inclusion and COntrol, but not Affection. So I looked at ways to add Affection to the letter codes. The easiest way was to add two more letters, with one toggling eA, and the other wA. But I wanted to keep the four letters. So the way to do that was that since Affection was possibly apart of Inclusion (interaction style), it could use the same combinations as the Interaction Styles, but with modifications. The easiest to use are lowercase letters. Sort of like the way Socionics uses them for its version of the system. We start from the assumption that the "natural" combination has Inclusion and Affection as the same temperament. It seems a lot of people are like that. So this would be the common four letters in capitals, like INTP. So if Inclusion is introverted and informing, and we we assume the Affection is the same; so if we want to change the Affection, we can do it one factor at a time. To change eA, we look at what defines eI. It is always E/I. So if we want to make eA extroverted, we would change the I to a lowercase. iNTP. This would change it from Supine-Choleric-Supine to Supine-Choleric-Sanguine. If we want to change wA, we look at wI. It is ultimately the P that makes the Inclusion informing. So to change wA to directing, we make the P lowercase. INTp. This would be a Supine-Choleric-Melancholy. To change both eA and wA, we simply change both the I and P: iNTp. This would be a Supine-Choleric-Choleric. Of course, for extroverts, when we want to change the Affection to Introverted, we make the E lowercase. If we had a type like ESFJ (San-Mel-San), the F, rather then the P is what determines informing; so to change it to San-Mel-Chlor, it would be ESfJ. San-Mel-Mel is eSfJ. And San-Mel-Sup is of course, eSFJ. For the FP's, to change to low wA, you could make the letters not tied to the Control (Conation temperament) lowercase. ESfP: San-San-Chlor; ENFp: San-Sup-Chlor. To change directive to informative, we would make the letters T or J lowercase. So for any of the 16 letter combinations, we can create a third dimension, and expand it to 64 types!
Pure Sanguine (GGG)ESFP
Sanguine-Sanguine-Choleric ESfP
Sanguine-Sanguine-Melancholy eSfP
Sanguine-Sanguine-Supine eSFP
Sanguine-Choleric-Sanguine ENTP
Sanguine-Choleric-Melancholy eNTp
Sanguine-Choleric-Supine eNTP
Sanguine-Choleric-Choleric ENTp
Sanguine-Melancholy-Sanguine ESFJ
Sanguine-Melancholy-Melancholy eSfJ
Sanguine-Melancholy-Choleric ESfJ
Sanguine-Melancholy-Supine eSFJ
Sanguine-Supine-Sanguine ENFP
Sanguine-Supine-Melancholy eNFp
Sanguine-Supine-Choleric ENFp
Sanguine-Supine-Supine eNFP
Pure Melancholy (MMM) ISTJ
Melancholy-Melancholy-Choleric iSTJ
Melancholy-Melancholy-Sanguine iStJ
Melancholy-Melancholy-Supine IStJ
Melancholy-Choleric-Melancholy INTJ
Melancholy-Choleric-Choleric iNTJ
Melancholy-Choleric-Sanguine iNTj
Melancholy-Choleric-Supine INTj
Melancholy-Supine-Melancholy INFJ
Melancholy-Supine-Supine INFj
Melancholy-Supine-Choleric iNFJ
Melancholy-Supine-Sanguine iNFj
Melancholy-Sanguine-Melancholy ISTP
Melancholy-Sanguine-Sanguine iStP
Melancholy-Sanguine-Supine IStP
Melancholy-Sanguine-Choleric iSTP
Pure Choleric (CCC) ENTJ
Choleric-Choleric-Sanguine ENTj
Choleric-Choleric-Melancholy eNTJ
Choleric-Choleric-Supine eNTj
Choleric-Sanguine-Choleric ESTP
Choleric-Sanguine-Sanguine EStP
Choleric-Sanguine-Melancholy eSTP
Choleric-Sanguine-Supine eStP
Choleric-Melancholy-Choleric ESTJ
Choleric-Melancholy-Melancholy eSTJ
Choleric-Melancholy-Sanguine EStJ
Choleric-Melancholy-Supine eStJ
Choleric-Supine-Choleric ENFJ
Choleric-Supine-Melancholy eNFJ
Choleric-Supine-Sanguine ENFj
Choleric-Supine-Supine eNFj
Pure Supine (SSS) INFP
Supine-Supine-Sanguine iNFP
Supine-Supine-Choleric iNFp
Supine-Supine-Melancholy INFp
Supine-Melancholy-Supine ISFJ
Supine-Melancholy-Melancholy ISfJ
Supine-Melancholy-Choleric iSfJ
Supine-Melancholy-Sanguine iSFJ
Supine-Sanguine-Supine ISFP
Supine-Sanguine-Sanguine iSFP
Supine-Sanguine-Melancholy ISfP
Supine-Sanguine-Choleric iSfP
Supine-Choleric-Supine INTP*
Supine-Choleric-Melancholy INTp
Supine-Choleric-Sanguine iNTP
Supine-Choleric-Choleric iNTp
*See note at top
The next step would be to expand it as we have done to include moderate scores, for Phlegmatic and the blends. This will become harder, as you will need three states for the letters. Capital, lowercase, and something inbetween! Perhaps small caps. Or maybe we can do something with subscripts and/or superscripts. or bolds, italics, underlines, etc. In any case, we would now have the nine types in three dimensions for a total of 729 types! Then we would have to figure out which "X"s would have to be case-changed, and it would become harder and harder again, as more X's are added. If we come up with a way to split the four moderate blends pairs back to their separate "Phlegmatic" blends (e.g. Phlegmatic Melancholy and Phlegmatic Choleric), we could then represent all 2197 APS temperament combinations with the four letter codes! It might then be better to just put those blends back with their "regular" temperament.
For now, here are the blends of the five pure temperaments (the other four plus Phlegmatic) completing the 125 basic APS combinations:
Phlegmatic in Affection (both e and w become moderate)
Sanguine-Sanguine-Phlegmatic ESFP
Sanguine-Melancholy-Phlegmatic ESFJ
Sanguine-Choleric-Phlegmatic ENTP
Sanguine-Supine-Phlegmatic ENFP
Supine-Supine-Phlegmatic INFP
Supine-Melancholy-Phlegmatic ISFJ
Supine-Choleric-Phlegmatic INTP
Supine-Sanguine-Phlegmatic ISFP
Melancholy-Melancholy-Phlegmatic ISTJ
Melancholy-Choleric-Phlegmatic INTJ
Melancholy-Supine-Phlegmatic INFJ
Melancholy-Sanguine-Phlegmatic ISTP
Choleric-Choleric-Phlegmatic ENTJ
Choleric-Melancholy-Phlegmatic ESTJ
Choleric-Supine-Phlegmatic ENFJ
Choleric-Sanguine-Phlegmatic ESTP
Phlegmatic in Control
Sanguine-Phlegmatic-Sanguine ESFY
Sanguine-Phlegmatic-Melancholy eSfY
Sanguine-Phlegmatic-Choleric ESfY
Sanguine-Phlegmatic-Supine eSFY
Sanguine-Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic ESFY
Choleric-Phlegmatic-Choleric ESTY
Choleric-Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic ESTY
Choleric-Phlegmatic-Melancholy eSTY
Choleric-Phlegmatic-Sanguine ESTY
Choleric-Phlegmatic-Supine eStY
Melancholy-Phlegmatic-Melancholy ISTY
Melancholy-Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic ISTY
Melancholy-Phlegmatic-Choleric iSTY
Melancholy-Phlegmatic-Sanguine iStY
Melancholy-Phlegmatic-Supine IStY
Supine-Phlegmatic-Supine ISFY
Supine-Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic ISFY
Supine-Phlegmatic-Melancholy ISfY
Supine-Phlegmatic-Choleric iSfY
Supine-Phlegmatic-Sanguine iSFY
With Phlegmatics in Inclusion, since it starts out moderate (inbetween) in both scales, superscripts and subscripts will determine the lower or higher eA and wA scores.
Phlegmatic-Sanguine-Phlegmatic ASXP
Phlegmatic-Sanguine-Sanguine ASXP
Phlegmatic-Sanguine-Melancholy ASXP
Phlegmatic-Sanguine-Choleric ASXP
Phlegmatic-Sanguine-Supine ASXP
Phlegmatic-Choleric-Phlegmatic ANTY
Phlegmatic-Choleric-Choleric ANTY
Phlegmatic-Choleric-Melancholy ANTY
Phlegmatic-Choleric-Sanguine ANTY
Phlegmatic-Choleric-Supine ANTY
Phlegmatic-Melancholy-Phlegmatic ASXJ
Phlegmatic-Melancholy-Melancholy ASXJ
Phlegmatic-Melancholy-Choleric ASXJ
Phlegmatic-Melancholy-Sanguine ASXJ
Phlegmatic-Melancholy-Supine ASXJ
Phlegmatic-Supine-Phlegmatic ANFY
Phlegmatic-Supine-Melancholy ANFY
Phlegmatic-Supine-Choleric ANFY
Phlegmatic-Supine-Sanguine ANFY
Phlegmatic-Supine-Supine ANFY
For Phlegmatics in Inclusion and Control, XY together determines wA.
Pure Phlegmatic (PPP) AWXY
Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic-Sanguine AWXY
Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic-Choleric AWXY
Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic-Melancholy AWXY
Phlegmatic-Phlegmatic-Supine AWXY
© ETB 2007-9