Archetypes (short version)

Full version

The best way to think of complexes, is that just as the ego is itself a complex, and our main sense of "I"; complexes can be thought of different "ego-states", or lesser senses of "I" partially dissociated from each other (Dissociation is what becomes the familiar "multiple personality" disorders when it is too great, yet is quite normal in lesser degrees. This concept is from an Austrian psychologist Paul Federn, who also articulated a “Two Energy Theory” that basically corresponds to the attitudes. This paper: http://www.ptintensive.com/images/Journal_3-2_Ego_Surrender.pdf ("Ego Strengthening and Ego Surrender" Diane Zimberoff, M.A. and David Hartman, MSW) and the book Ego States: Theory and Therapy, John G. and Helen H. Watkins, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1997 explain this well). One ego state can be anger at someone, and another can be happiness, or sadness, amorous, etc. These all are kinds of "ruling patterns" (archetypes) connected to the limbic system of emotions. Through them, we can have different expressions of "I" that feel different things.

So we can think of lesser senses of "I" that constellate and tend to "use" these other functions, at certain times. Thus "we develop an inferiority complex around the inferior function, a superiority complex around the superior function, a 'best auxiliary' complex (the caretaker) around the auxiliary function, and an 'eternal child' complex around the tertiary function." (Beebe)

So to sum it up, the so-called "type stack" consists of the eight functions-attitudes being carried by eight different "complexes", or "parts of ourselves", representing different senses of "I"; each having its own "agenda", which it seeks through the associated functional perspective:

 

Extraverted Sensing

Obviosity

Introverted Sensing

Familiarity

Extraverted iNtuition

Implications

Introverted iNtuition

hunchery

Extraverted Thinking

authority

Introverted Thinking

expedience

Extraverted Feeling

Fellowship

Introverted Feeling

contentment

Hero

Ego’s dominant achiever

ESP

Lives to experience the current tangible world

ISJ

Lives by known experience

ENP

Lives to imagine possibilities of objects

INJ

Lives by internal impressions

ETJ

Lives by externally necessitated logical order

ITP

Lives to relish internal "truth"

EFJ

Lives by external personal harmony

IFP

Lives to relish internal values

Parent

The part of us that seeks to impart ego’s knowledge

ISP

Seeks to share physical experience

ESJ

Seeks to share familiar knowledge

INP

Seeks to share ideas for objects

ENJ

Seeks to share insights

ITJ

Seeks to share means’ of logical order

ETP

External engagement colored by internal logic

IFJ

Seeks to impart social harmony

EFP

Seeks to impart sense of "humanity"

Child

The part of us that seeks relief and nurses old wounds

ENJ

Finds relief through physical activity

INP

Finds relief through nostalgia

ESJ

Finds relief through imagining with objects

ISP

Finds relief through internal impressions

EFP

Finds relief through establishing logical order

IFJ

Finds relief in logical frameworks

ETP

Finds relief in social harmony

ITJ

Finds relief in internal values and likes

Inferior

The part of us that feels inferior and looks up to life

INJ

Feels inferior in physical reality

ENP

Feels inferior regarding factual information

ISJ

Feels inferior in totally "open" situations

ESP

Feels inferior in pondering deep meanings

IFP

Feels inept with logical order, but aims to serve others

EFJ

Feels inferior with logical principles

ITP

Feels inferior in social situations

ETJ

Feels inferior regarding personal integrity

Warrior/Amazon [OP]

The part of us that attacks obstacles to ego’s drive

ISJ

Sees emergent reality as an obstacle

ESP

Sees reliance on prior knowledge as obstacle

INJ

Sees "open" ideas as obstacle to vision

ENP

Sees internal closure of ideas as obstacle

ITP

Sees external logical authority as obstacle.

ETJ

Sees ‘subjective’ logic as hindrance to goals

IFP

Sees external values as hindrance to the self

EFJ

Sees internal needs as obstacle to harmony

Senex/Crone ("Critical parent")

The part of us seeking to be negative and find fault

ESJ

Looks for faults in sensory environs

ISP

Looks for faults in history

ENJ

Looks for faults in open ideas

INP

Looks to find fault using internal impressions

ETP

Looks to find faults in logical order

ITJ

Looks to find fault in others’ subjective logic

EFP

Looks to find fault in social values

IFJ

Looks to find fault in personal values

Trickster

The part of us that seeks to get out of double binds, and reverse them onto others

INP

Seeks tangible reality to seek or create distortions of facts

ENJ

Uses past knowledge to seek or create distortions of fact

ISP

Would use objective ideas to find or create traps

ESJ

Uses internal impressions to prove negative thoughts or feelings

IFJ

Uses objective authority to seek or create distortions of truth

EFP

Use internal principles to seek or create distortions of truth

ITJ

Pays attention to social values to anticipate traps or trap others

ETP

Uses internal values to seek or create distortions of right and wrong

Demon

The part of us that hates ourselves, God, others, and wants to destroy

ENP

Will take impulsive action when threatened

INJ

Ignores past until using it to undermine someone else’s position

ESP

Objective possibilities are a threat and are imagined under stress

ISJ

Will use hunches to undermine self or others

EFJ

Will order the environment in a rash way that causes disharmony

IFP

Will undermine self and others with internal principles

ETJ

Will wield social values as a weapon against others

ITP

Will react to universal violations of values and regard life as worthless

Return to Index